Jason Lindquist (jlindquist) wrote,
Jason Lindquist

Well that's brief...

From yesterday's Congressional Record, the "earmark-stripping" amendment that was voted down 32-63:
The Senator from Arizona [Mr. McCain] proposes an amendment numbered 592. </p>
(Purpose: To continue funding at fiscal year 2008 levels through the end of fiscal year 2009)

    Strike all after the enacting clause and insert the following:


    Section 106(3) of Public Law 110-329 is amended by striking ``March 6, 2009'' and inserting ``September 30, 2009''.

The key, kids, is "continuing 2008 funding levels". Yes, the earmarks would've been dropped from the $410B omnibus spending bill being debated now. That would have been good. But it restores the spending priorities of the Bush Administration. Yeah, THAT's change we can believe in.

  • This is the KGB

    The question of from whence came KGB-FM finally popped into my head again while I was sitting in front of the computer, so I went looking for its…

  • Heineken? Fuck that shit!

    Raise a glass, noted San Diego brewmaster Karl Strauss has died in Milwaukee. Especially if you're Dennis Hopper, for Karl reformulated PABST BLUE…

  • Various Sorts of Hell

    Vendor Hell: At work, a vendor said they would sell us a chassis with an Intel shelf manager. Except they didn't say their definition of "with" is…

  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.